Critics enjoy the whole ragging business and sometimes they're right on point. For Hancock, it fits about right in the middle. It's your run-the-mill blockbuster hit featuring Will Smith in it, littered with crappy editing, cool special effects, and a decent enough story to get the movie going. It's a classic example of a great idea, but so-so execution. It'll probably get remade 10 years later, and pulled off even better. That's not to rag on it complete or call it a bad film. It's right up there on "pretty cool" and "not as bad as you'd think." 7.4/10.
Popular Posts
-
If you're all about expressionism, then you've probably got one of these. They're like the Moleskin notebooks (apparently everyo... -
Sucks to be us folk in the states, since this awesome carrying case for your DS Lite looks to be currently available only in Japan. Upon vis... -
This slow, moody homage towards the noir genre isn't the action packed cop and villain story that becomes box office hits. It's more... -
I don't like the iPhone. Neither does Dvorak when he tested it. Die iPhone ! -
There's no doubt the Obama-terrorist references and racial slurs thrown at McCain-Palin rallies have become the center of attention thes... -
Japanorama meets complete, relentless insanity. Though calling it pure gore would be shorthchanging the creative style, brilliant direction,... -
For quick reference. For the hipster yuppie living in Upper East Side manhattan. -
Perhaps it's a bad idea to chase a mindless action flick with another one the night after. I was initially apprehensive about the film, ... -
Man, I'm such a bum. Didn't properly calibrate my HDTV for a year and have been putting up with shoddy picture quality for way too l...
0 comments:
Post a Comment