While it's definitely not one of the best Bond films, I found it to be a worthy entry nonetheless. The problem was primarily due to the fact that Casino Royale did such a great job in portraying Bond as such an emotional, enigmatic character, that the bar was set so much higher than any previous entries in the series. As tempting as it may have been, QoS manages to not create a repeat Casino Royale, but instead attempts to incorporate a Bourne-ish conspiracy theory lined with shrouds of endless mystery. What this equates to (though I wished it hadn't) is a slightly muddled execution, with merely decent character development and lackluster jokes that ultimately lend me to give it this average score. 7.8/10.
Popular Posts
-
Ain't nothing like a dedicated gallery for something I have completely no understand of nor money to support as an addiction. Still, it ... -
"If you have any answers, I will be glad to provide full and detailed questions." -
Yesterday, I learned how to ride a bike. Today, I learned how to describe a bike. Tomorrow, I'll learn how to create a bike. -
In her eyes, you're worth as much as your mouth can handle. After a few minutes of hot and steamy conversation, you start to forget why ... -
This is a great example of exactly why I don't like Ben Stiller. It's one of those movies where you're thinking to yourself thro... -
If you're not familiar with Takeshi Kitano's films, one word of advice is approach them with the expectation of being faced with sur... -
Usually when hype reaches a certain level, there's no way a movie can match the expectations of such a diverse audience composed of view...
0 comments:
Post a Comment